Animal Friends’ Recycled Pets are Best! gala a success |

Animal Friends’ Recycled Pets are Best! gala a success

“I already have five; I can’t bring any more home!” laughed Bob Fragasso, who was among those of us having our willpower tested during Animal Friends’ Black Tie & Tails: Recycled Pets are Best! gala at the Circuit Center in the South Side on Saturday.

Indeed, it was good luck! to anyone trying to walk on past the big brown eyes that lined both sides of the hallway as we meandered in and had to sit, stay for awhile, mentally calculating how many furballs we could fit into our Fords.

Inside, honorary chairs Howard and Rosemary Loevner joined co-chairs Tracey Eakin, Sarah McKean and Cindy Russell for a sell-out wine-and-dine that also saw the likes of party animals Mark and Catherine Loevner, artist Wayno, Kathy Fertig, Christi Robinette, prez David Swisher and board chair Marleen Ashton, aww-ing their way through a crowd that included a top hat-wearing rabbit and a pit bull with a pedicure.

Tails were wagging as more than $400K was fetched during this fave fete, with donors coming forward with $86K just for the rescue, rehab and re-homing of homeless animals.

Photo Galleries

Black Tie and Tails

Black Tie and Tails

Howard and Rosemary Loevner with O’Bannon during Black Tie and Tails – Animal Friends at the Circuit Center on Saturday, November 6, 2010.Mike ManciniFanfareMM FF Tails 01

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.