Annual schools report shows academic achievement down locally, across state |

Annual schools report shows academic achievement down locally, across state

An annual report on the state of Pittsburgh Public Schools showed academic achievement declined in the district and across the state.

District watchdog group A+ Schools released its 10th “Report to the Community” early Monday, which highlights trends and progress at each school.

The decline was not as steep this year in math and reading than in previous school years, spokesman James Fogarty said. Pittsburgh standardized test scores improved overall.

“We know readers are as curious as we are about what contributes to gains as well as persistent low achievement in our schools,” the report said. “There is no single answer.”

Schools vary widely in academic performance, and the achievement gap between black and white students decreased slightly since 2006.

Graduation rates increased between 2011 and 2013 by 8 percentage points. The percentage of students enrolled in advanced courses increased 26 percentage points between 2012 and 2014.

The percentage of students whose grade point averages qualify for the Pittsburgh Promise, which offers college scholarships to all Pittsburgh Public graduates, declined for the third year in a row.

The report showed the district, though significantly smaller than in years past, is more ethnically diverse and catering to many more low-income families.

Pittsburgh Public shrank from 84 schools in 2004 to 56 this year and serves about 8,000 fewer children, according to the report.

Enrollment dropped 12 percent since 2010 in high schools. Middle and elementary school enrollment decreased less than 4 percent each.

To view the full report, visit .

Megan Harris is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-388-5815 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.