ShareThis Page
Another board member leaving |

Another board member leaving

| Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:00 p.m

A second member of Pittsburgh’s state-appointed oversight board announced Tuesday that he’s stepping down now that the city has won approval for new and higher taxes.

James L. Smith III, an investment banker who once was signed by the Steelers, resigned from the state Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority, effective immediately. Smith said he always had intended to remain on the board only until the city’s immediate financial crisis had been resolved.

“This was a good break in the action,” said Smith, of Upper St. Clair, who served as the oversight board’s first chairman.

House Minority Leader Bill DeWeese, D-Greene County, appointed Smith to the board in February 2004. State lawmakers created the panel that month to study the city’s finances, recommend changes and ensure the city stays within an approved budget.

Board support for the city’s five-year budget plan was an essential part of state lawmakers approving a tax package for Pittsburgh last year.

DeWeese has committed to finding a minority candidate to fill the slot, said Smith, who is the managing director for Global Markets and Investment Banking at Merrill Lynch.

The oversight board has been criticized by some for having white males in each of its five seats.

Former Allegheny County Chief Executive Jim Roddey has said he also will step down from the board later this year.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.