ShareThis Page
Call in the troops! Downtown Partnership on territorial crusade |
Antwon Rose Shooting

Call in the troops! Downtown Partnership on territorial crusade

| Sunday, May 15, 2016 11:30 p.m
A rendering of the concourse at Nova Place, a redevelopment of the former Allegheny Center Mall in the North Side.

Not to suggest U.S. troops need to immediately liberate the North Shore, but the Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership’s imperialist aggression has to be stopped.

The advocacy organization recently released its annual report, which lauded a surge in Downtown development. Particularly noteworthy is that most of the surge didn’t occur Downtown.

Of the $636 million in projects either announced or under construction, only $146 million is happening in what most folks consider Downtown: The Golden Triangle between the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers.

To mask what otherwise would be a developmental decline, the partnership included projects in a new “Greater Downtown” area that also includes — take a deep breath — the North Shore, South Shore, Uptown, the Bluff, Lower Hill District and the Strip District to 31st Street, which is practically Lawrenceville.

In justifying this unprecedented expansionism, partnership officials essentially declared Downtown borders meaningless. Can you imagine if North Korea tried this tactic?

Suppose its supreme leader and goofball Kim Jong-un one day said, “You know, South Korea is so close to us we can hear its people arguing at night even with the windows closed. I think we’ll unilaterally annex its capital of Seoul and all the plants that make cheap apparel for Wal-Mart.” The U.S. immediately would send tens of thousands of reinforcements for the 25,000 troops already protecting South Korea, if only to safeguard America’s strategic interest in Lynyrd Skynyrd and Simpsons T-shirts.

One of the most significant “Greater Downtown” projects is Faros Properties’ $200 million conversion of the former Allegheny Center Mall into the Nova Place tech hub. Being that the property is in the North Side, in a neighborhood officially known as “Allegheny Center,” there’s good reason why it never was called the Downtown Center Mall.

What does Faros think about suddenly being a part of the new “Greater Downtown?” Company spokeswoman Gretchen D’Atri told the Trib that because Nova Place is a five-minute walk from Downtown, “We are Downtown.”

No you’re not, and the Faros website inarguably indicates the company knows exactly where its $200 million development isn’t located: “Set in the heart of Pittsburgh’s NORTH SHORE (emphasis added), Nova Place offers a unique office setting in the city without the congestion of Pittsburgh’s Downtown area.”

D’Atri probably was just attempting to protect her family and friends from possible reprisals from this ruthless expansionist regime. But denying the realities of geography only will embolden the partnership, perhaps to the point where next year it will expand its definition of Downtown Pittsburgh to include portions of Cleveland.

The emperor has no clothes, but this is not a problem a Simpsons T-shirt can resolve.

The imperialist aggressors have too much territory.

Eric Heyl is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7857 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.