Archive

ShareThis Page
Gov. Corbett’s money production makes for comedic cautionary tale | TribLIVE.com
Antwon Rose Shooting

Gov. Corbett’s money production makes for comedic cautionary tale

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, November 1, 2014 9:00 p.m.

Lights! Camera! Inaction!

Welcome to the set of “Scofflaw Studios,” a new movie being filmed locally. A comedic cautionary tale of the consequences of not properly doing your job, the film appears to be a joint production of alarmingly inefficient state and Allegheny County bureaucrats.

This madcap romp’s budget has been set at $2.5 million, mere peanuts by major studio standards. That probably isn’t enough to cover the makeup costs of turning actors into Middle Earth inhabitants for the surefire upcoming blockbuster, “The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies.”

Still, Pennsylvania taxpayers who could end up financing the project can be forgiven for being upset. What constitutes chump change to big-time Hollywood producers such as Jerry Bruckheimer is extravagant expense to most people in Munhall.

The plot concerns a down-on-his-luck governor (played by Gov. Tom Corbett; typecasting, I know) racing around his state in the waning days of his re-election campaign. During a Pittsburgh-area appearance, he announces a $2.5 million grant to help pay for a $10 million expansion of Island Studios in McKees Rocks.

The plot takes an unexpected twist, probably because audiences usually aren’t enthralled with anticipated ones.

Court records indicate the movie studio owner has more than $540,000 in back taxes, unpaid loans and payments owed to contractors. (Former Fox Chapel resident and current Pittsburgh Film Office board member Michael Dolan plays the studio head, a role for which he seemingly was born.)

Despite Dolan’s having sued the state over the amount of taxes he owes, and his reassurances that all outstanding debts will be settled, uproar ensues. People are upset that a portion of the property taxes they pay on time might directly benefit someone who is tardy with his own taxes.

Slapstick bureaucratic backpedaling begins immediately.

The governor’s office says that no check will be cut until the project is reviewed, prompting astute observers to ask: Shouldn’t that have been done before the grant was announced?

The governor’s office notes that it is the county’s responsibility to vet its grant applicants. County officials counter they never applied for the money on the studio’s behalf, which would explain why they blew off vetting. The governor’s office produces a July letter from its budget office to the county stating the state indeed received an application, but doesn’t produce the actual application.

No one can explain how Dolan got the grant that he now might not end up getting. Much head-scratching ensues.

“Scofflaw Studios” has garnered abysmal word-of-mouth, an extremely rare occurrence for a movie that hasn’t finished filming and whose ending has yet to be scripted. That doesn’t bode well for the movie having box office success, or a widespread theatrical release.

When it comes to this stinker, seems as though the director long ago should have yelled, “Cut!”

Eric Heyl is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-320-7857 or eheyl@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.