ShareThis Page
Heyl: Things could look fuzzy for Hillary after her alignment with Comcast |
Antwon Rose Shooting

Heyl: Things could look fuzzy for Hillary after her alignment with Comcast

| Thursday, June 4, 2015 10:42 p.m
Getty Images
Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks at the Inaugural Barbara Jordan Gold Medallion at Texas Southern University on June 4, 2015 in Houston.

Hillary Clinton’s commitment to cable could cost her dearly.

Clinton capturing the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination is considered by many to be as inevitable as Kim Jong Un’s victory in last year’s North Korean presidential election. (Kim won a half-decent 100 percent of the vote, a landslide likely attributable to voters facing certain execution if caught casting ballots for anyone else.)

But Clinton’s pursuit of campaign cash potentially could jeopardize her chances of capturing the nomination and the White House. She is about to align herself with an entity perhaps more reviled in this country than ISIS, Ebola or even Donald Trump.

Clinton is at risk of being identified as Comcast’s candidate.

David L. Cohen, Comcast’s executive vice president and former Gov. Ed Rendell’s onetime chief of staff, will host a fundraiser for Clinton on June 26, according to Politico. Cohen likely will rake in considerable Comcast contributions for Clinton; he’s a bigger rainmaker than the Three Rivers Arts Festival.

Clinton is so far in front of her Democratic opponents in the polls that they can’t see her without the aid of the Hubble Space Telescope. Some of that interstellar distance might be made up if they consistently can link her to Comcast.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders might ask if Clinton intends to provide Comcast-level customer service to America. The American Customer Satisfaction Index released Tuesday had Comcast again ranked among the worst-rated of all domestic brands and services.

Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley might wonder whether Clinton can be as successful getting her agenda through Congress as Comcast recently was in its attempted merger with Time-Warner Cable. Despite spending $17 million a year on lobbyists, Comcast couldn’t consummate a deal that would have enabled it to become even more unresponsive to consumers.

Wait — is it possible to become more unresponsive than a corpse?

If Clinton survives such assaults and is nominated, she will have to perform well in Pennsylvania to win the presidency. Quinnipiac University consistently surveys Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida residents in its Swing State Poll.

What makes these states critical?

“It’s pretty simple,” said Peter A. Brown, the poll’s assistant director. “Each of them has a lot of electoral votes. And since 1960, no president has been elected without winning two of the three states.”

In pursuing Pennsylvania’s 20 electoral votes, it wouldn’t be surprising for Clinton’s Republican opponent to tie her to Comcast, a company that offered $45 billion for Time-Warner yet somehow can’t afford to pay for its own skyscrapers.

You might recall that Pennsylvania taxpayers kicked in $30 million last year toward Comcast’s new Philadelphia headquarters. They contributed $43 million in 2005 toward construction of the company’s current Philly headquarters, in a deal Cohen helped broker with the Rendell administration three years after leaving it.

The Comcast connection could prove to be calamitous for Clinton.

She’d be much better off going with FIOS or a dish.

Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7857 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.