Apollo-Ridge football coach resigns |

Apollo-Ridge football coach resigns

John Simon stepped down as coach of the Apollo-Ridge football team after compiling a 7-20 record in three seasons, including 1-8 this year.

Simon, 45, who has taught mathematics at the high school for 15 years, said he decided to leave coaching so he could spend more time with his family. His wife, Jennifer, is a business owner, and they have four children.

“I’ll be quite frank, for myself and my family, I think my coaching career is done,” Simon said.

Simon was named coach in 2008, when Apollo-Ridge made the jump from Class A to AA. The previous season, the Vikings had gone 6-5 and earned their first WPIAL playoff win.

Simon guided Apollo-Ridge to consecutive 3-6 finishes before the Vikings slipped to one win this year — a 35-7 victory over West Shamokin in the season finale.

Apollo-Ridge will remain in Class AA for at least one more season.

“John did a lot of positive things for the community with the players,” Apollo-Ridge athletic director Ray Bartha said. “We had a rough year. Wins and losses, it was tough. I’m sure he was a little frustrated.”

Simon also endured a couple of embarrassing incidents during his tenure.

In 2009, the WPIAL suspended him for two games after he inadvertently made contact with a referee while arguing a penalty. This season, the school district suspended several players for at least one game for an incident involving a cell phone camera during training camp.

Bartha said Apollo-Ridge will advertise the position in-house first. He said hiring a new coach before Christmas would be a “great scenario.”

All of Apollo-Ridge’s coaches receive one-year contracts.

“With a new person coming on, you want to give them a chance to get acquainted and get the winter weight-lifting program going,” Bartha said. “It’s important to start the process immediately.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.