Appealing young cast highlights ‘Hansel and Gretel’ |

Appealing young cast highlights ‘Hansel and Gretel’

Mark Kanny

Pittsburgh Opera’s welcome revival of “Hansel & Gretel” in a new production Saturday night featured an especially appealing cast drawn from the young professional singers of its Resident Artists program and impressive stage direction by Ted Huffman.

Engelbert Humperdinck’s music is irresistible. He had been part of Richard Wagner’s scene a quarter-century before he wrote the opera, yet achieved a lightness and charm in “Hansel and Gretel” that no one associates with Wagner.

The opening scene, when the siblings play and dance instead of doing their chores, draws upon the delights of German folk music, just as Gustav Mahler did in his “Youth Magic Horn” songs. But Humperdinck’s musical language is actually sophisticated, quite original and fabulously orchestrated.

The world premiere in 1893 was conducted by composer Richard Strauss, who called it “an absolute masterpiece of the highest quality.” The next year, Gustav Mahler conducted it, and also loved it.

The opera was last mounted by the Pittsburgh Opera in 1987, a long time ago for such a remarkable piece. The Brothers Grimm fairy tale about the adventures of a brother and sister was turned into an opera both down-to-earth and fantastic by the composer working with his sister, Adelheid Witte.

Mezzo-soprano Stephanie Lauricella as Hansel and soprano Suzanne Vinnik as Gretel were each outstanding and a well-matched pair of siblings. Lauricella adjusted her timbre to an appealing boyish purity and shaped her lines with artful simplicity. Vinnik projected the strong personality of her role with impressively security and tonally rich singing.

Soprano Alexandra Loutsion sang both the mother and the witch. She superbly conveyed both aspects of the mother — fearsome to her children when she returns to find their work undone, but fully dimensional with her husband when he returns at the end of the first act.

Except that the siblings were so strong, Loutsion would have stolen the show with her bold characterization of the Witch, a masterful blend of vocal acting with stylized movement.

Baritone Kyle Oliver offered a winning portrayal of the father, with excellent diction. He’s young and his voice has room to grow, but his legato was most impressive. And he already has the dramatic taste to not overplay tipsiness into drunkenness.

As always, despite change in personnel over the years, the Children’s Festival Chorus was absolutely professional, both as the dulled spirits of children trapped by the Witch and their exuberant selves when they are freed by Hansel and Gretel after the Witch has been dispatched.

Glenn Lewis conducted Pittsburgh Opera Orchestra in an assured performance of a reduced orchestration. While there were places that would have benefited from a somewhat-faster pacing, the balances were excellent.

The new production in Creative and Performing Arts High School is a low-budget affair, with no backdrops. In the first act, set in the family home, the center of the stage is occupied by a huge pile of found furniture — a reflection of the family’s poverty. In the second act, in the forest, the chairs are suspended above the stage, perhaps as tree limbs. Only in the magical final act, in the witch’s house, is the furniture arranged normally.

Many parents brought young children, all well-behaved, to Saturday night’s performance.

“Hansel and Gretel” will be repeated at 7 p.m. Tuesday, 8 p.m. Friday and 2 p.m. Sunday, Dec. 5 at Creative and Performing Arts High School, Downtown. Admission is $50. Details: 412-456-6666 or .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.