ShareThis Page
Appraisal of Pittsburgh parking assets will be sought |

Appraisal of Pittsburgh parking assets will be sought

| Tuesday, November 2, 2010 12:00 p.m

City Councilman Patrick Dowd plans to introduce legislation this week directing Mayor Luke Ravenstahl to seek an independent appraisal of some Pittsburgh Parking Authority assets.

Dowd’s legislation, which council could discuss Thursday, follows the authority’s refusal to hire experts to study the feasibility of the authority buying a garage and lots with borrowed money that would be invested in the city’s retirement funds.

Dowd believes the idea is still worth exploring.

“Nobody has said this is a bad transaction,” he said Monday. “They said the price of (a study) is too high.”

The city faces a Dec. 31 deadline to raise the pension funding for 8,000 active and retired employees from 27 percent to 50 percent of an estimated $1 billion in obligations, or face a takeover by the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System. State officials said they expect to tell city officials this week how much it would pay annually into pensions under state management.

“They can study whatever they want to death,” Ravenstahl’s spokeswoman Joanna Doven said. “The mayor is not going to issue new, irresponsible debt — period.”

Council last month rejected Ravenstahl’s plan to lease garages and metered spaces to a private company for 50 years. Council members then proposed selling Mellon Square garage, five lots and 7,000 metered spaces to the authority, which would borrow at least $220 million.

In a 3-2 vote, the authority refused to hire experts to study the plan. Board member Linda Judson expressed concern the authority would have to pay for a study.

Dowd’s legislation says the authority “expressed interest in the proposed sale but was unwilling to pay for the independent analysis required to offer a proof of concept of the sale.”

Dowd said if an independent study on parking assets showed the idea was a good deal, the authority could pursue its own study.

The legislation calls for the mayor and city’s director of operations to issue requests for bids for professional services, including an independent appraiser, a parking consultant to develop parking rates, a financial advisor and bond counsel.

Council President Darlene Harris said she hadn’t discussed the legislation with Dowd.

“It’s not up to council to do an analysis,” Harris said. “That has to come from the Parking Authority.”

Councilwoman Theresa Smith, who voted against council’s plan, said Dowd’s legislation “just adds fuel to the fire. It’s not adding to anything.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.