Appreciate caregivers |

Appreciate caregivers

With Thanksgiving here, I’m writing, as a young individual with multiple sclerosis (MS), in support of the Lifespan Respite Care Program. November is National Caregiver Awareness Month and I want to remind people of the importance of family caregivers.

They provide 80 percent of long-term care to the chronically ill in the United States. Estimates on the economic value of our nation’s more than 64 million uncompensated family caregivers are between $450 and $522 billion. To put that it into perspective, that was more than Medicaid spending in 2009.

Family caregivers are vital to enable their loved ones to remain at home and in the community. In 2006, Congress authorized the Lifespan Respite Care Program — the only federal program addressing respite issues regardless of age or disability. The program has provided grants to 32 states and the District of Columbia.

Because multiple sclerosis often strikes between the ages of 20 and 50, many respite programs don’t benefit MS families due to our young age. Access to respite care improves caregiver health, promotes family stability and prevents costs to the health-care system and taxpayers.

Please contact your member of Congress, asking to continue to fund the Lifespan Respite Care Program in the final fiscal-year 2015 appropriations bill.

Most of us, at some point, will become a caregiver or need one. I am thankful for mine. Happy Thanksgiving.

John Platt


The writer chairs the National MS Society’s Pennsylvania Government Relations Committee.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.