ShareThis Page
Architect’s aide returns to masterpiece |

Architect’s aide returns to masterpiece

| Sunday, August 28, 2005 12:00 a.m

At 93, Edward Tafel is the single surviving eyewitness to the early morning events of Sept. 22, 1935, when legendary architect Frank Lloyd Wright, then 69, is believed to have drawn up the plans for Fallingwater, the weekend home of department store magnate Edgar J. Kaufmann Sr. and his family located in Mill Run in Fayette County’s Laurel Highlands.

Now nearing the 70 year anniversary of the event, Tafel traveled to Fallingwater from his Greenwich Village home in New York for the annual meeting Saturday of the Fallingwater Advisory Committee.

He was one of 15 apprentices to Wright at the time the architect drew up the plans at his Taliesin, Wis., compound. Tafel was also the site supervisor for the second half of the construction of Fallingwater, making him the last person alive to have actually worked with the building. Tafel also worked on part of the early drawings.

Wright conceived Fallingwater in December 1934. Over a two-hour period in his studio the following September, he put the official drawings to paper for the first time. Kaufmann, who had called early that morning to announce he was on his way to make a surprise visit, immediately accepted the concept when shown the drawings later that same day.

“I can’t think of another building in the history of architecture where you can say it came out in one day,” said Franklin Toker, a University of Pittsburgh professor of the history of art and architecture whose book “Fallingwater Rising” details the construction of the building and the relationship between Wright and Kaufmann.

Fallingwater resuscitated Wright’s reputation and career.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.