ShareThis Page
Area’s bid for Bassmasters Classic to be submitted |

Area’s bid for Bassmasters Classic to be submitted

| Sunday, October 26, 2003 12:00 a.m

Officials in Pittsburgh and southwestern Pennsylvania are about to officially put themselves in the running to host the 2005 Bassmasters Classic fishing tournament.

Before the end of the week — just in time to beat a Nov. 1 deadline — the Pittsburgh Classic Committee will submit its bid to host the tournament, considered the world’s premier bass fishing event. It would be held on the Allegheny, Monongahela and Ohio rivers.

The Classic is run by the Bass Anglers Sportsmen’s Society. Its parent company, ESPN, televises the tournament live.

The Pittsburgh committee — composed of bass fishermen, local and state tourism officials, foundation representatives and others — has been working for months to put together a bid for the 2005 Classic.

Denny Tubbs, a committee member and aquatic resources program specialist in the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission’s Somerset office, would not say how much the bid is worth.

It is believed, though, that any bid must include a payment of about $500,000 to $750,000 to ESPN.

At least two or three other cities are competing for the 2005 Classic, Tubbs said. But he believes the Pittsburgh committee’s offer — which would use public and private funds — will be competitive.

“Our proposal looks really good, really good,” Tubbs said. “There seems to be a lot of interest on the part of ESPN to come to Pittsburgh and southwestern Pennsylvania, too.”

The committee’s proposal pitches the idea that a Classic in Pittsburgh would be a “thinking man’s” tournament, Tubbs said. That’s because the Allegheny, Monongahela and Ohio are all different.

The Monongahela has lots of bass, but few are exceptionally large, Tubbs said. The Ohio has fewer fish, but bigger ones, including some in the eight- to nine-pound range. The Allegheny is somewhere in the middle.

Because of the time it takes to get through the locks on each, anglers would have to decide which river to fish, then commit to it.

“They won’t be able to run 50 miles from spot to spot like they do on some of these lakes,” Tubbs said.

Being awarded the Classic would likely bring about $25 million into southwestern Pennsylvania, Tubbs said. It would also showcase the quality fishing to be found here.

“We’re not the industrial area we once were, with all of the bad waters, polluted waters. We have a lot of fish, and not even a lot of people inside the city realize that,” Tubbs said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.