ShareThis Page
Armstrong 911 Calls |

Armstrong 911 Calls

| Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:00 a.m

The following dispatches were received from Armstrong 911:

NORTH APOLLO — North Apollo fire department responded to set up a landing zone for a medical helicopter at 2112 River Road at 8:01 a.m. Sunday.

KITTANNING — Hose Co. 4 responded to a report of a garbage can on fire at 501 N. Jefferson St. at 9:45 a.m. Sunday.

KITTANNING — Hose Co. 1 responded to a report of a garbage can on fire at St. Mary’s playground at 9:47 a.m. Sunday.

PLUMCREEK — Elderton fire department, along with Citizens 81, responded to a motorcycle and car accident with entrapment at 11328 Route 422 at 10:43 a.m. Sunday. Elderton fire department also set up a landing zone for a medical helicopter.

GILPIN — Leechburg and Gilpin fire departments, along with Lower Kiski EMS, responded to a report of an automatic fire alarm at 140 Deercreek Drive at 11:05 a.m. Sunday.

KISKI — Kiski fire department responded to a report of a gas leak outside of a house on the Roaring Run Trail at 2:07 p.m. Sunday.

FORD CITY — Ford City fire department, along with Ford City EMS, responded to a report of an automatic fire alarm at 1016 Sixth Ave. at 2:44 p.m. Sunday.

KITTANNING TWP. — Elderton, Manor Township, Rayburn, Kittanning Township and Burrell fire departments and Kittanning Hose Co. 4, along with Kittanning EMS, responded to a report of a shed on fire at 196 Township Shed Road at 5:45 p.m. Sunday.

KITTANNING TWP. — Kittanning Hose Co. 6 and Kittanning Township fire department responded for standby at 13126 Route 422 at 6:27 p.m. Sunday.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.