Armstrong County holds line on taxes |

Armstrong County holds line on taxes

KITTANNING — Armstrong County commissioners presented a preliminary budget for the 2011 fiscal year on Thursday that has no increase in the county’s property tax rate from last year. Officials boasted that if the fiscal plan is adopted, it would be the fifth straight year with no tax increase for property owners.

The county’s financial manager, Don Pepler, said the $18.4 million budget includes a spending increase of about $496,000 over this year’s budget due to increases in salary, retirement and health care costs. The amount is offset mainly by revenues from increases in assessed property values and Tax Claim Bureau collections, he said. Increased jail revenues and domestic relation order reimbursements contributed as well, according to a budget summary provided by Pepler.

Pepler said assessed property value went up by about $4 million to $939 million adding $44,000 in new revenue.

In addition, the county is projecting about $260,000 more from delinquent tax collections, he said.

“The Tax Claim office has done an excellent job,” Pepler said.

The plan includes no major cuts in services.

“We’ve achieved efficiency across the board,” Pepler said of department spending practices.

The balanced budget keeps the real estate tax at 15.5 mills. Of that, 12.5 mills of revenue goes into the general fund and 3 mills is for debt services.

A mill of taxes would generate about $939,000 in revenue for the county. For a property owner with an $80,000 home, with an assessed value of $40,000, the tax bill would be slightly more than $600.

County employees are to receive a 3 percent increase in salary, according to the budget.

The commissioners announced that the preliminary budget is available for public review and is expected to be up for final approval at the commissioners’ meeting at 1:30 p.m. Dec. 16 in the courthouse annex building.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.