ShareThis Page
Armstrong explores sites for senior center |

Armstrong explores sites for senior center

| Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:00 a.m

Once a week, senior citizens from the top of Armstrong County ride the bus to the senior center in Kittanning to do some socializing.

They take part in activities, exercise a little, chat some and eat lunch.

And while there are currently 11 Armstrong County Area Agency on Aging senior centers placed around the county, there is none in the area between one in Bradys Bend and one in Dayton.

For seniors residing in Madison, Mahoning and Redbank townships and South Bethlehem Borough, that may soon change.

The Area Agency on Aging is exploring options to open a center there.

Community and county leaders say they agree with the need.

“We have the population in that area to do that,” Armstrong County Commissioner Rich Fink said.

According to Nancy Wright, the agency’s center supervisor, the 4-year plan (2004 to 2008) with the county identified a high concentration of seniors in that area.

There are nearly 900 citizens that are 60 years old or older there, Wright said.

In Redbank Township, 60 and older is 25 percent of the overall population; 23 percent in Mahoning Township; and 28 percent in South Bethlehem Borough. The agency only has data for 65 and older in Madison — 16.5 percent.

The new center, which will start out operating one day a week, is in the preliminary stages of development. Officials are looking at potential sites including two in Distant — the Church of God and the fire hall, according to Wright.

The county’s Planning Commission has participated in helping to find a site.

The selected center has to have state approval and be in accordance with federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations.

“People are saying they would enjoy having a center,” Wright said. “There’s still a lot of groundwork to do to make it happen.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.