ShareThis Page
Arnold man wounded in Lower Burrell shooting |

Arnold man wounded in Lower Burrell shooting

| Tuesday, November 15, 2016 7:33 a.m.

An Arnold man was shot early Tuesday in what Lower Burrell police described as an attempted robbery and carjacking.

Police said James Pinkston, 26, of Leishman Avenue was grazed in the neck by a bullet just before 12:30 a.m.

He was in the rear parking lot of Jerry’s Custard, an ice cream stand along Seventh Street Road in Lower Burrell.

Jerry’s has been closed for the season since Oct. 21.

Police said Pinkston told authorities that he and another man planned to meet in the parking lot and then go to a bar to meet women.

Instead, police said, the other man tried to rob Pinkston, shooting him with a large-caliber handgun and stealing the car he was driving.

Pinkston told police he didn’t know the identity of the shooter, Lower Burrell police Chief Tim Weitzel said.

Weitzel said Pinkston walked to the nearby Tel-Star Inn along Seventh Street in New Kensington, where he summoned help.

Police said Pinkston was treated and released from Allegheny Valley Hospital in Harrison.

Weitzel said the white 2008 Ford Taurus Pinkston was driving was found along Rose Street in Lower Burrell, which is a short drive from the shooting scene.

The alleged assailant is described only as a white man who wore a dark hooded sweatshirt and gray shorts.

Anyone with information is asked to call police at 724-339-4287.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4711 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.