ShareThis Page
Assessment appeal satellite hearing sites overbooked |

Assessment appeal satellite hearing sites overbooked

| Sunday, June 30, 2002 12:00 a.m

PITTSBURGH: As the appointments for property assessment appeals hearings fill up at the satellite suburban sites, some Allegheny County property owners are getting frustrated.

The suburban hearings, organized to make it easier for disabled property owners and the elderly to appeal the county’s 2002 assessments, can be difficult to schedule.

Allegheny County Councilman Rick Schwartz, D-Plum, complained to county administrators that he has taken calls from the elderly, people with sick children and others who cannot make it downtown for a hearing.

The county’s director of administrative services, Norm Mekkelsen, told Schwartz he can make arrangements for any property owner for whom it truly is a hardship to travel downtown.

“We will certainly take those cases into consideration,” Mekkelsen said. “But it’s the 20-year-old guy who just doesn’t want to take the time that we’re not making considerations for.”

With about 70,000 assessment appeals to process by the end of the year, the county has scheduled the bulk of the cases at the County Office Building at Ross Street and Forbes Avenue, downtown.

The department can handle only about 1,350 hearings during each of the two-week sessions at suburban sites, so those appointments must be reserved for property owners who have a genuine hardship, county officials have said. Many of the appointments for hearings Oct. 7-11 and Oct 15-18 in Harmar and Aug. 5-9 and Aug. 12-16 at the Boyce campus of the community college in Monroeville already are booked.

“If I have a real hardship case, I can work something out,” Mekkelsen said.

Although she isn’t elderly or disabled, Mary Grace Guiliano, who works in Plum, would like to appeal the assessment of some vacant land she owns in Penn Hills. Since she doesn’t drive and can’t afford to take time off work, however, Guiliano likely will let the appeal slide, she said.

“If they don’t give me an east suburban location, I’m not going to fight it and that’s not fair,” she said.

“Why should I waste an 8-hour day?” Guiliano said. A downtown hearing would mean taking a day off work, finding a ride downtown and buying lunch, Guiliano said. All of which she cannot afford, she said.

Mekkelsen said he will try to find a suburban site appointment for any property owner with a real difficulty. Callers should make clear why they cannot schedule an appointment downtown, he said.

“We always overbook, because we know there are people who won’t show up,” he said. “We’ll work it out.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.