ShareThis Page
At polls, some voters show distaste for negative ads |

At polls, some voters show distaste for negative ads

| Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:00 a.m

Bob Casey Jr. may have a storied political name in Pennsylvania, but it cost him at least one vote Tuesday in Squirrel Hill.

“I don’t like Casey. I didn’t like his dad, and I didn’t like him,” said Larry Mercurio, 42, shortly after casting his vote for Ed Rendell, Casey’s opponent.

Casey, the state auditor general, faced off against Rendell, the former Philadelphia mayor, for the Democratic nomination for governor. Democratic voters interviewed by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review yesterday said the campaign’s negative tone and their opinion of Casey’s late father, a former Pennsylvania governor, influenced their decision.

Ed Szymkowiak, 77, of the South Side, said he voted for Rendell “because of some of the dirty tricks that Casey’s been pulling. His father did the same thing to (Bill) Scranton.”

Scranton was the elder Casey’s Republican opponent in the 1986 election for governor, another campaign that was marked by negative advertising. The elder Casey was governor from 1987-95.

“He’s only running on his father’s name,” Szymkowiak said of Casey.

In Bellevue, however, the O’Laughlin family is firmly behind Casey — at least in the primary. Robert and Barbara O’Laughlin and their daughter, Colleen, all cast their votes for Casey. The O’Laughlins said they were turned off by the negative advertisements by both campaigns.

Colleen O’Laughlin, 24, said she voted against Rendell because friends from Philadelphia told her he did a poor job as mayor.

“Casey has state experience,” said Barbara O’Laughlin, 56.

The O’Laughlins, like other voters, said they have not made up their minds who they will vote for in November, the Democratic winner or state Attorney General Mike Fisher, of Upper St. Clair, who ran unopposed for the Republican nomination.

“I have not focused on who Mike Fisher is yet,” said Jay Galbreath, 47, a Republican from Mt. Lebanon.

Galbreath said he thinks Rendell would make a better governor than Casey — again, basing his decision on Casey’s name.

“I never liked Casey Sr., and I suspect I won’t like Casey Jr.,” Galbreath said.

Casey, like his father, is anti-abortion, which cost him the vote of Klara Heilbrunn, 64, of Squirrel Hill. Plus, she likes that Rendell was a big-city mayor.

“He’s from Philadelphia, so he may have a broader outlook,” Heilbrunn said.

Mercurio said he will base his decision in the general election on which candidate has the best plan for Pennsylvania’s economy. He said he would have voted for state Treasurer Barbara Hafer, a Republican who dropped out of the race last year.

Francis Fredrick, 63, a Mt. Lebanon Democrat, said either Casey or Rendell will have a tough time beating Fisher in western Pennsylvania. Frederick voted for Rendell yesterday.

“I think he must have done a good job. So many newspapers have endorsed him,” Fredrick said.

Jim Brown, 75, a Republican poll worker in Mt. Lebanon, said he’s backing Fisher this fall. Brown said Rendell would have a tough time against Fisher.

“(Rendell) doesn’t have the name recognition that Bob Casey’s father has,” Brown said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.