ShareThis Page
Attack on London: Answer the question |

Attack on London: Answer the question

| Friday, July 8, 2005 12:00 a.m

While the shock of the terrorist explosions in London was still bloody hot on Thursday, British Prime Minister Tony Blair spoke for the G-8 leaders conferring in Scotland:

“We shall prevail and they shall not.”

But this eloquence is not action, nor is it certain prophecy. On this day of mourning for the people of London — informed by 9/11 and our common cause with Britain in the war on terror — Mr. Blair’s statement is more apt when it becomes a question:

Shall we prevail?

The blasts in the subway and on a bus shut down London’s public transit system, the underground portion, or “Tube,” managed by Pittsburgh native Tim O’Toole. Public transportation in London averages 8.4 million riders daily; the city was brought to a shattered standstill.

The message sent is as unmistakable as it is a lie: Leave Afghanistan and Iraq, or this is not over.

Yet the practitioners of radical Islam know no end. The West is an affront to the theocratic nihilism of this new world order and must, over time, be broken.

As these radicals do not have the strength to do so directly, they count on our fear, our self-imposed weakness and our guilt. The attacks in Spain accomplished a change in government and a withdrawal from the war.

If the West “deserves this” for its sins, then it deserves much more — a final dissolution.

These bastards know no justice and know no god. But that does not answer the question:

Shall we prevail?

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.