ShareThis Page
Audit sought of Pittsburgh anti-crime initiative |

Audit sought of Pittsburgh anti-crime initiative

| Wednesday, April 7, 2010 12:00 p.m

City officials want to see what has been done with $200,000 approved for a crime-fighting initiative before earmarking more money for the program.

The long-delayed Pittsburgh Initiative to Reduce Crime, announced in September 2008 by Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and Councilman Ricky Burgess, aims to reduce crime by up to 50 percent. But some members of council are questioning how much progress has been made.

“It’s been 18 months,” said Councilman Bruce Kraus, who on Tuesday called for the City Controller’s Office to conduct an audit of the program. “This is not about absentee landlords. … This is about bodies in the street. This is about life and death.”

Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh have been mapping gang activity throughout the city. Once complete, the program will allow gang members to become advocates for the police department in exchange for jobs and social services.

Although council members in October 2008 approved $200,000 for the program, the contracts were not officially completed until late last year, Burgess said. The money was used as start-up funds for the program.

Burgess said Jay Gilmer, PIRC’s coordinator, is “quietly assembling all the pieces” needed to begin the program “soon.” Gilmer, hired in June at an annual salary of $45,000, was out of the office and could not be reached for comment.

Burgess yesterday introduced legislation to allocate another $200,000 to the program. Today, he plans to introduce legislation that would reimburse the project’s lead architect, Professor David M. Kennedy, director of the Center for Crime Prevention and Control at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, for $7,000 worth of travel and business expenses. Kennedy declined to comment on the expenses.

Councilwoman Theresa Smith said such public safety initiatives are often “a waste of money” and called for a yet-to-be scheduled public hearing on both the PIRC program and the city’s seldom-used juvenile curfew center.

Despite reduced homicide rates — down from 70 in 2008 to 38 last year, according to police records — Burgess said there’s still room for improvement and a need for the initiative.

“They have been reduced, but any number of homicides is too many,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.