ShareThis Page
Auditing firm to analyze tax collection discrepancies |

Auditing firm to analyze tax collection discrepancies

Karen Zapf
| Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:00 a.m

Plum School Board plans to hire an auditing firm to determine why the tax collector and the district’s auditor reported slightly different amounts of money being collected during the past two years.

Board members told Tax Collector Harry Schlegel that they have concerns because the end-of-year tax collections he reported do not match those in the annual report by the district’s outside auditor.

Specifically, district officials said Wednesday that the audit report for the 2001-02 school year showed $14,570,000 was collected in real estate taxes. Schlegel reported taking in $14,580,247, or $10,247 more than the auditor’s figures.

Also, the audit report for the 2000-01 school year put real estate tax collection at $13,785,032. Schlegel’s list totaled $13,774,326, or $10,706 less than the auditor’s figures.

“We are not saying any money was taken,” said Dawn Check, school district public relations director. “The records just do not total out. It could be as simple as an incorrect line item. We just want to get a clear picture. We owe that to the taxpayers.”

“These are simple accounting procedures,” board member Jan Schoeneberger said. “We cannot accept (being) $10,000 out.”

“This cannot go on year after year,” board Vice President Gary Horner said.

Schlegel collects school and occupational taxes for the district. He said school tax collection totals about $20 million per year.

Schlegel contends the district’s auditing firm, Hosack, Specht, Muetzel & Wood, never came to the tax office to look at the records.

“I jive with my system,” Schlegel said. “My system is balancing. It goes along with the amount of money I put in the bank.”

Horner suggested officials hire a firm “on a project basis” to look at Schlegel’s records and try to explain the differences.

Schlegel said Wednesday that he plans to spend his own money to bring someone in to analyze his system. Schlegel said the analysis is scheduled to begin today.

District officials emphasized they are not accusing Schlegel of wrongdoing.

Rather, district Business Manager Mark Lukacs said the dispute with Schlegel arises out of a difference in philosophy concerning tax collections.

“We are not questioning Harry’s integrity,” Check said. “We are questioning his philosophy for handling money.

“There are some accounting questions that the auditor raises and Harry is unable to answer to the satisfaction of the school board.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.