Archive

ShareThis Page
Authorities probe death of police officer’s son | TribLIVE.com
News

Authorities probe death of police officer’s son

A family is in mourning and Allegheny County Homicide detectives are investigating the shooting death of a police officer’s child in Liberty.

Liberty police Chief Luke Riley said Gavin Thompson, 5, son of officer John Thompson who is on the police force in Liberty and Port Vue, was transported to UPMC McKeesport Friday afternoon with a bullet wound to his upper body after the boy apparently shot himself with his father’s service pistol.

Gavin was pronounced dead at the hospital later that day. Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office declined to release information about the boy by presstime.

“Distraught does not begin to cover it,” Riley said after responding to the call for the shooting incident shortly after noon at Thompson’s home along F Street in Liberty.

Allegheny County police Superintendent Charles Moffatt also went to the scene, and county police are handling the investigation, Riley said.

Liberty Mayor Edward Slater said he heard of the tragedy through Riley Friday evening.

“I know Mr. Thompson very well because he’s worked for us for several years,” the mayor said.

“He’s a very efficient cop and very nice person. It’s tough to take. In my 47 years I’ve been in office up here, I’ve never had to deal with something like this.,” he added. “It’s unfortunate something like this happened. I hope Officer Thompson handles it well.”

Thompson is married and has four other children. He has served as a part-time Liberty officer for the past 10 years, and has served as a full-time officer in Port Vue for five years.

Riley said Thompson has been put on administrative leave. It was not immediately clear how the boy found his father’s weapon, or whether it was secured at the time.

Tribune-Review News Service contributed to this story.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.