ShareThis Page
Authority abandons plan to bury ash in landfill |

Authority abandons plan to bury ash in landfill

| Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:00 a.m

The Kiski Valley Water Pollution Control Authority is considering new options for disposing of uranium-contaminated ash from an former treatment lagoon, including asking the federal government to dispose of it along with waste from another nuclear contaminated site.

Authority Director Bob Kossak said Wednesday that he has abandoned plans to dispose of the 12,000 cubic meters of contaminated ash in a municipal landfill after residents near the East Huntingdon site slated to take the ash vowed to block the move.

Greenridge Landfill and two others subsequently withdrew their bids to accept the waste. The state Department of Environmental Protection, which issued a permit for the authority to move the ash, has said the authority could ask for new bids and choose another destination for the ash, but Kossak said he won’t do that.

“I don’t think it would be worth the trouble,” Kossak said.

Instead, Kossak has asked state and federal elected representatives, including U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Johnstown, to help come up with money to pay for an alternative to dumping the ash in a landfill.

“We could afford the option rejected by the concerned citizens of the area,” Kossak said. “That’s all we could afford.”

The landfill disposal plan was expected to cost about $900,000, Kossak said in his letter to officials. Of that, $800,000 was to come from a loan and $100,000 was to come from the authority’s surplus fund.

Kossak has suggested two alternative disposal plans, both of which are sure to cost much more.

The first suggestion would be to cap the contaminated ash where it is in the former treatment lagoon along the banks of the Kiski River. Along with being expensive, this plan would prevent future expansion of the authority’s facilities there, Kossak said.

The second option would be to include the treatment plant lagoon in the Army Corps of Engineers cleanup of a nuclear wate dump in Parks. That site contains radioactive waste from the same Parks and Apollo nuclear processing plants that contaminated the wastewater treatment plant lagoon.

That site along Route 66 contains 10 buried trenches cut into the hillside above what once was the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corp.’s plutonium-processing plant in the Kiskimere section of the township. Much, if not all, of the radiological and chemical contamination occurred during the 1960s.

The corps is scheduled to begin cleaning up that site next year, taking the contents to a low-level nuclear waste facility.

“I think for the Valley, the best option would be to include it in the (Parks dumpsite) closure,” Kossak said.

Local activist Patty Ameno, who helped East Huntingdon residents coordinate their campaign to stop the initial plan, also believes the lagoon ash should be disposed with the Parks dumpsite waste.

“It’s like a set of luggage,” she said. “You don’t want to break up the set. Send all the pieces together.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.