ShareThis Page
Autopsy held in death of resident at Fayette recovery facility |

Autopsy held in death of resident at Fayette recovery facility

The cause of death of a man whose body was discovered early Sunday morning in a pond at a men’s drug and alcohol recovery home in Wharton Township is not being released pending test results, according to the Fayette County Coroner’s Office.

The body of Michael James Cameron, 21, who was a patient at Another Way Inc., 708 Nelson Road, was found by another patient at 7:30 a.m., state police at Uniontown said. The pond is between the facility and the road, police said.

Jessie Camilli, office manager for Coroner Phillip Reilly, said Cameron was pronounced dead at 9:35 a.m. Sunday. An autopsy to determine cause of death was conducted Monday in Pittsburgh.

Reilly said Monday evening that autopsy results would not be released until he receives all test results and speaks with the victim’s family.

Police did not reveal Cameron’s hometown. Camilli said he is listed as having multiple addresses.

Another Way is one of 10 facilities in Fayette County listed by the state Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs on its drug and alcohol treatment service provider network.

Sonya Mowry, Another Way director, could not be reached for comment.

Liz Zemba is a Trib Total Media staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.