ShareThis Page
Avonmore man turns himself in to police after all-night search |

Avonmore man turns himself in to police after all-night search

| Friday, August 11, 2006 12:00 a.m

An Avonmore man turned himself in to police shortly before noon Thursday after authorities spent the night combing the woods around Freeport for him.

Freeport Police Chief Jeff Swiklinski said police searched for Charles Limberg Jr., 48, of Reeds Lane, since shortly before 1 a.m. when he allegedly assaulted an officer, crashed his car and fled into the woods surrounding Freeport Community Park.

The incident began when a police officer noticed Limberg in the park after it closed, Swiklinski said.

The officer suspected Limberg was intoxicated and when he began to question the man, Limberg refused to comply and struggled with the officer, Swiklinski said.

Limberg got into his car and tried to drive away, but crashed into a fence and then ran, Swiklinski said.

Officers searched the woods, fearing that Limberg could be injured, the chief said.

Police were joined by firefighters at about 6 a.m. and called for a state police helicopter shortly before Limberg turned up about noon at the police station in Freeport, Swiklinski said.

Police charged Limberg with aggravated assault, escape, resisting arrest, criminal trespassing, criminal mischief, hit and run, drunken driving, fleeing and eluding police.

“At this point, he’s very apologetic,” Swiklinski said.

Wynne Everett can be reached at

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.