'Bachelor' candidate from Sewickley Hills goes off script |

'Bachelor' candidate from Sewickley Hills goes off script

Megan Parris is bleeping mad about her portrayal as a foul-mouthed crybaby on “The Bachelor.”

“It’s important for people to understand that what they saw on TV was a character,” said Parris, 25, of Sewickley Hills and an assistant coach of the Quaker Valley High School girls lacrosse team. “It wasn’t me. It was not at all indicative of who I am as a person. It was complete misrepresentation of who Megan Parris is.”

Parris, a 2001 Quaker Valley graduate, said that parts of the ABC reality show are bogus and that producers edited scenes to make her look bad. She spent 2 1/2 weeks filming in Los Angeles before she was booted in the fourth episode of the show, in which two dozen women compete for an engagement to a handsome bachelor.

“There’s nothing real about it,” she said of the show’s trademark “confessionals,” in which contestants talk to the camera about the latest goings-on.

“It is scripted,” she said. “They basically will call you names, berate you, curse at you until they get you to say what they want you to say.”

Both ABC and Warner Bros., the studio that produces “The Bachelor,” had no comment.

But during a teleconference call this month, executive producer Mike Fleiss denied that this season was scripted.

“We don’t do that,” he said. “We’ve never done that and we never will do that.”

The show came under scrutiny after this season’s finale when “Bachelor” Jason Mesnick dumped his original choice, Melissa Rycroft, for runner-up Molly Malaney.

“You know, the good thing about unscripted television is that it’s unpredictable, and that’s what this was,” Fleiss said. “I mean, it caught us off guard, caught the viewers off guard and, you know, that’s why unscripted television works.”

Parris sees it otherwise.

“It’s really hurtful,” Parris said. “After I watched the first episode, I literally wanted the earth to swallow me. They made me feel like they were going to make me out to be America’s sweetheart. I went into the experience completely naive and trusting and vulnerable. I let myself get completely manipulated.”

Parris’ on-screen drama and potty-mouth tendencies were the result of editing, she said.

“They chopped up pieces of conversation and did voiceovers,” she said. “So they’d show a flash of my face and then they’d flash to something else, but I’d still be talking. So they chopped up different parts of conversations to string them along to make them sound like a sentence. But it’s nothing I would ever say.”

In network promotions for the show, Parris was seen crying and using foul language, something she said she doesn’t do. She admitted to swearing early on, but said later edits did not actually represent swear words.

“From there on out, I was bleeped almost every episode,” she said.

Parris said her sister hasn’t spoken to her since the show first aired in January. And she’s worried what new players on the lacrosse team and their parents will think of her.

“So they know, ‘OK, my daughter’s going to be a freshman, she’s going to play for this girl. This is going to be her coach, we’re going to watch her on TV.’

“They used my real name and my real hometown, but created a character out of me that did not accurately represent me at all,” Parris said.

Jessica Garavaglia, the head lacrosse coach at Quaker Valley, did not respond to e-mails seeking comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.