Archive

ShareThis Page
Back to ‘Mad Men’? | TribLIVE.com
News

Back to ‘Mad Men’?

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:00 p.m

Why were so many ballot initiatives in line with President Obama’s agenda adopted (deny fetal personhood, gun checks, sick time, minimum wage) in the Nov. 4 elections and yet the public chose those candidates who opposed them? The economy is better, the car industry is healthy, 10 million more people have health care, we breathe and drink cleaner, there is more freedom to marry, the stock market is positive. Ebola and ISIS have yet to be totally resolved, but neither deserves the “fear mongering” that has been unleashed.

Obama deserves more credit than either party has given him. This “Chicken Little” mentality is silly. And the “take the country back” proponents drive me wild. Back to where? “Mad Men,” here we come — when men were men, women were objects and gays and blacks were on the fringe.

Ellen M. Shar

Bethel Park

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.