Baer funding beats Orie’s in race for seat on state’s top court |

Baer funding beats Orie’s in race for seat on state’s top court

The Associated Press

HARRISBURG — Democrat Max Baer has raised more than a half-million dollars in his bid for the state Supreme Court — more than Republican foe Joan Orie Melvin, but only because of loans from his generous family.

In terms of cash contributions, Melvin has accumulated more — about $444,000 compared to about $325,000 for Baer — as the candidates brace for a potentially expensive showdown this fall.

As of Sept. 15, the last day covered by campaign-finance reports filed this week, Melvin’s campaign had more than $300,000 in cash on hand, compared to Baer’s $50,000.

Baer, an Allegheny County judge, hopes to raise more than $1.5 million for his statewide campaign, most of which would be spent on television advertising, spokesman John Marshall said.

“People don’t concentrate on judicial races, so you have to hit them (with campaign commercials) more often,” Marshall said.

John Brabender of Brabender Cox, Melvin’s Pittsburgh-based media consultant, said he did not know how much Melvin’s campaign expects to spend but speculated that the effort would be concentrated in the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh markets, where voter turnout is expected to be relatively high.

“This is an off-year election,” he noted.

The Supreme Court race features the same campaign strategists who guided the candidates in last year’s gubernatorial race.

Brabender Cox served as media consultant for Mike Fisher, the state attorney general and Republican nominee. The Campaign Group, the Philadelphia company that handled media consulting for Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell, has already received $200,000 in payments from Baer’s campaign.

The campaign-finance reports show that Baer had taken in more than $508,000 through Sept. 15. Of the total, more than $183,000 was in the form of loans from Baer’s brother, Washington County car dealer Mark Baer; their father, Henry Baer; and the candidate himself.

Baer’s campaign committee — the Committee to Elect the Fighting Judge, a reference to the famous boxer whose name he shares — also still owes nearly $176,000 that the trio loaned to Baer’s 1989 campaign for the county judgeship he now holds.

“The debt is family debt” that does not have to be repaid right away, Marshall said, although he allowed that, “if he can raise enough money down the road, it’d be nice to pay somebody back.”

Melvin, a judge on the state Superior Court, listed no debt in her latest report.

From mid-June to mid-September, the period covered by the report, Melvin raised more than $255,000 and spent $64,000. Baer raised $161,000 and spent $133,000.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.