ShareThis Page
Bail reset for man accused of prank calls to Fayette 911 |

Bail reset for man accused of prank calls to Fayette 911

| Wednesday, June 1, 2011 12:00 a.m

A district judge Tuesday reset bail for a Masontown man accused of making hundreds of prank telephone calls to the Fayette County 911 dispatch center.

Chad Everett Cooper, 21, appeared briefly in the courtroom of District Judge Michael M. Metros and waived his right to a preliminary hearing.

Metros asked about his employment opportunities in the event he can post bail, and Cooper said a friend is trying to “line up” a landscaping job for him for the summer. He said he has been receiving public assistance.

Metros reset Cooper’s bail at $10,000 unsecured bond. It had been $10,000 straight bond.

Cooper was charged with making 445 calls to the dispatch center between April 14 and May 1, asking female dispatchers about their underwear and sexual preferences. Uniontown police filed 2,670 counts of stalking, harrassment, obstruction of the administration of law and disorderly conduct.

Police said the calls to the Uniontown dispatch center were made from Cooper’s cell phone.

Cooper, who was represented by public defender Mary Spegar, was returned to Fayette County jail.

Assistant District Attorney J.W. Eddy said a formal arraignment in Fayette County Common Pleas Court will be scheduled.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.