ShareThis Page
Bald Eagle Area wins first PIAA baseball title |

Bald Eagle Area wins first PIAA baseball title

| Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:00 a.m

ALTOONA – John Schall’s two-run home run ignited a four-run outburst that propelled Bald Eagle Area to its first PIAA baseball championship Saturday with a 6-1 victory over Kutztown at Blair County Ballpark.

Bald Eagle Area (21-6), the District 6, Class AA runner-up, had never reached a state title game until this season, when the Eagles averaged 10.6 runs in five previous postseason games during its march to the final.

Schall’s shot to left in the fourth off losing pitcher Austin Rohrbach erased a 1-0 Kutztown lead against winner Ryan McNamara, who limited the Cougars to five hits, walked four and struck out five in a complete-game effort.

The Eagles took a 4-1 lead into the sixth against Kutztown reliever Trent Mertz, when they got a pair of run-scoring singles from Tyler Quick and McNamara to make it 6-1.

Quick, who had three hits for Bald Eagle Area, also drove in two runs during the Eagles’ fourth-inning uprising with a double off Rohrbach.

Kutztown (20-8), the District 3 champion, scored its run in the second on a single by Andrew Miller. The Cougars’ threat ended only after McNamara loaded the bases, then struck out Carey Green.

Bald Eagle Area ends the season with a total of 31 home runs.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.