ShareThis Page
Bearcats out of NAIA |

Bearcats out of NAIA

Sam Ross Jr.
| Saturday, March 12, 2005 12:00 a.m

Point Lookout, Mo. — On a day when American Mideast Conference teams were running through the NAIA Tournament, it seemed destined that St. Vincent would complete a 3-for-3 day.

It wasn’t meant to be. St. Vincent, which had swept unbeaten to an AMC championship, came up short to Indiana Tech on Friday, losing 95-85 in overtime and falling from the NAIA Tourney in the Sweet 16 round for the third consecutive season.

The third-seeded Bearcats (25-5) weren’t the biggest upset victims of the day, that honor belonged to top seed William Jewell, which fell to another AMC team, Cedarville, earlier in the day.

But St. Vincent losing was a huge surprise to the crowd that nearly filled Keeter Gymnasium, on the campus of College of the Ozarks.

In the end, foul trouble on point guard Kenny Roberts, and a lack of balanced scoring that had propelled St. Vincent to a win in Round One, proved fatal.

It was a bitter pill for the senior-dominated St. Vincent team.

As coach D.P. Harris had said before the game, “If we lose, it’s a major disappointment, for the coaches, the players, and the institution.”

That was true on all counts.

St. Vincent never has advanced past the Elite Eight round in this NAIA Division II national tourney, but this had been perceived as the chance to make history.

A late 3-pointer by Felix Indaye in regulation tied the game at 74-74 and gave St. Vincent a second chance in overtime.

But Tech (26-7) dominated the overtime session, hitting foul shots and forcing St. Vincent into miss after miss from the field.

Roberts fouled out at 1:03 of overtime, with St. Vincent trailing 84-80.

Tony Washam led the St. Vincent in scoring with 36 points and Jeff Mallory added 18.

Tech’s JuJuan Cooley scored 32 and Kendrick Cornelius had 26.

It was sweet revenge for Indiana Tech, which had lost last year to St. Vincent, 113-96 in the first round of the NAIA Tournament.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.