ShareThis Page
Bearcats QB Collaros could face jail time |

Bearcats QB Collaros could face jail time

The Associated Press
| Friday, November 20, 2009 12:00 a.m

CINCINNATI — A judge warned University of Cincinnati sophomore quarterback Zach Collaros on Thursday that he could spend the bowl season in jail if he doesn’t get his act together after being accused of showing a fake ID at a bar.

Hamilton County Municipal Court Judge Bernie Bouchard scolded Collaros for failing to begin a court-ordered program on the dangers of underage drinking. Bouchard told Collaros he had until Dec. 7 or would face jail time.

“Got it• Are we clear?” Bouchard asked him. “You’re not going to get another chance.”

Collaros said through his attorney that he would begin the program right away.

“He knows better,” attorney Bill Mikita said in court. “The last few weeks have been kind of crazy.”

Collaros took over quarterbacking for the unbeaten, fifth-ranked Bearcats while senior Tony Pike recovered from an Oct. 15 arm injury. Collaros started four games.

Bouchard explained afterward that the diversion program is a chance for first-time offenders to “get a break and learn from their mistakes.”

Collaros was 20 when cited for presenting a fake ID to get into a bar near the main campus. Completing the diversionary program, ordered Oct. 5, would allow him to have the case dismissed and the record sealed. Otherwise, he could face as many as 180 days in jail.

Bouchard told Collaros, now 21, that skipping the program isn’t like “blowing off a math class” and that he needs to grow up.

Bouchard said afterward that he expected Collaros to quickly take the first step in the program — an interview about life history and any issues with substance abuse. A defendant also must pay $200 and attend an eight-hour class on underage drinking.

“I think he understands crystal-clear what he needs to do,” Bouchard said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.