ShareThis Page
Beaver County residents sue FirstEnergy Corp. over coal waste dump |

Beaver County residents sue FirstEnergy Corp. over coal waste dump

Brian Bowling
| Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:12 p.m

The Little Blue Run coal waste dump damaged properties and will continue to do so for decades, 15 Beaver County residents claim in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday.

The lawsuit against FirstEnergy Corp. mirrors one filed in October in Wheeling, W.Va., by more than 50 property owners. Both seek damages over arsenic, sulfates and other contaminants leaching from the dump.

“It’s just the Pennsylvania version of that,” said James DePasquale, one of the lawyers for the Beaver County residents. They had to sue in Pennsylvania instead of joining the West Virginia lawsuit, he said.

A FirstEnergy spokeswoman declined comment.

Kevin Madonna, another attorney for the residents, said the West Virginia lawsuit is still in the pre-trial stage and there’s no good estimate on how long it will take to resolve the lawsuits.

The residents are seeking monetary damages that will allow them to move away from the contamination, he said.

“Their properties have been permanently devalued,” Madonna said.

Little Blue Run accepts coal slurry piped seven miles from the Bruce Mansfield power plant in Shippingport.

The 1,700-acre impoundment contains enough coal ash to cover 62,600 acres if it were spread out one foot deep, the lawsuit says. By comparison, Pittsburgh’s city limits include about 37,300 acres.

FirstEnergy settled a Department of Environmental Protection lawsuit last year by agreeing to stop using the unlined reservoir by Dec. 31, 2016. The company’s closure plan includes letting liquid waste harden and then covering it with layers of high-density plastic, cloth and soil.

The closure process is scheduled to take at least 15 years after the dump quits taking waste.

Groundwater contamination will continue and likely peak in 70 to 100 years, the lawsuit says.

Brian Bowling is a Trib Total Media staff writer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.