Beechview resident Wagner drops out of Pa. gubernatorial primary |

Beechview resident Wagner drops out of Pa. gubernatorial primary

Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Jack Wagner, 66, of Beechview dropped out of the Democratic gubernatorial primary on Wednesday, March 26, according to a Department of State filing.

Former state Auditor General Jack Wagner said he did something Wednesday that he has never done — dropped out of a race.

“The financial reality set in,” said Wagner, who was the only Democratic gubernatorial primary candidate from Western Pennsylvania. “I realized it was virtually impossible to compete with the other candidates, especially due to the fact that I got into the race so late.”

Wednesday was the deadline for candidates to withdraw and remove their names from the May 20 ballot.

Wagner, 66, of Beechview is a former Pittsburgh City Council president and state senator. He ran and lost Democratic primaries for lieutenant governor in 2002, governor in 2010 and mayor of Pittsburgh in 2013.

Wagner entered the 2014 governor’s race in late February, long after other candidates began raising money, campaigning and gathering campaign petition signatures.

That made it difficult to gain a financial foothold, he said.

“So many people were either committed to other candidates or sitting this race out,” he said.

When he entered the race, Wagner expected to be outspent but said his experience and Pittsburgh-area roots would play in his favor.

“Obviously, I felt strongly about running or I would not have jumped in,” he said. “I was the only moderate Democrat running to reform government.”

He does not plan to endorse a candidate.

Four candidates remain in the Democratic race: York County businessman Tom Wolf, U.S. Rep. Allyson Schwartz of Montgomery County, state Treasurer Rob McCord, and former state Environmental Protection secretary Katie McGinty of Chester County.

Salena Zito covers politics for Trib Total Media. Reach her at 412-320-7879 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.