ShareThis Page
Beijing seeks closer military ties with U.S. |

Beijing seeks closer military ties with U.S.

WASHINGTON — China’s military sought to assure the United States on Monday that its arms buildup was not a threat and said Beijing wanted to expand cooperation with the Pentagon to reduce the risk of conflicts.

At the start of a visit to Washington, Xu Caihou, vice chairman of the People’s Liberation Army Central Military Commission, said military ties were generally moving in a “positive direction” and defended China’s fast-paced military development as purely “defensive” and “limited” in scope.

“We are now predominantly committed to peaceful development, and we will not and could not challenge or threaten any other country” and “certainly not the United States,” Xu told a Washington think tank before talks with Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

Xu described China’s development of advanced weapons systems, including cruise and ballistic missiles, as “entirely for self-defense” and justified “given the vast area of China, the severity of the challenges facing us.”

“As you know, China has yet to realize complete unification,” Xu said, an apparent reference to Taiwan, which China considers a renegade province. “So I believe it is simply necessary for the PLA to have an appropriate level of modernity in terms of our weapons and equipment.”

China’s navy is emerging as a “capable regional navy” with the ability to protect shipping lanes and bring military force to bear throughout that part of the world, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Gary Roughead told the Tribune-Review in an interview last week. Roughead said he expects China eventually to add an aircraft carrier to its already formidable fleet of submarines and surface ships.

Xu’s visit, which will include a tour of major military bases, including U.S. Strategic Command, was meant to give a boost to military-to-military dialogue, which Beijing resumed this year after halting it in 2008 to protest a $6.5 billion U.S. arms sale to Taiwan.

U.S. officials have expressed alarm about what they see as China’s unprecedented military expansion over the past year. Last week, Gates said better dialogue was needed to avoid “mistakes and miscalculations.”

“I want to make clear that the limited weapons and equipment of China are entirely to meet the minimum requirements for meeting national security,” Xu said through a translator.

He said military mechanization was still at an early stage. “China’s defense policy remains defensive” and was designed to repel attacks, not initiate attacks, he said. “We will never seek hegemony … military expansion.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.