Belle Vernon man facing child sex assault charges |

Belle Vernon man facing child sex assault charges

Richard Michael Meglaye

A Belle Vernon man is accused of sexually assaulting the daughter of a family friend over a six–year period.

Richard Meglaye, 35, is facing a number of felony charges including statutory sexually assault.

Meglaye turned himself into North Strabane Police Monday, according to WPXI-TV, a news partner of The Valley Independent.

According to the criminal complaint, Meglaye began the inappropriate relationship with the girl in 2008 when she was 11 years old. The girl allegedly told police he took her to a secluded area of a public park and began kissing her.

She told police he began having sex with her when she was 13 years old at unsupervised visits, providing her with alcohol and marijuana before the sexual assaults, according to WPXI.

The girl told police she wanted to come forward years ago but Meglaye allegedly told her that he would lose custody of his son.

He is charged with corruption of minors, indecent assault–person less than 13, aggravated indecent assault without consent and a person less than 13, intimidation of a witness, indeviate sexual intercourse, aggravated assault–person less than 16, indecent assault–person less than 16, and statutory sexual assault–11 years or older.

Meglaye was arraigned before Magisterial District Judge Jay Weller of Canonsburg and sent to the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $100,000 bond.

He faces a preliminary hearing before Weller at 9:30 a.m. Sept. 24.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.