Archive

ShareThis Page
Bernanke electrocutes the dollar | TribLIVE.com
News

Bernanke electrocutes the dollar

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke announced his expected second “quantitative easing” (QE2) on Nov. 3. At the click of an electronic mouse, the Fed created a further $600 billion to purchase U.S Treasury debt.

Combined with financing costs and the reinvestment of maturing mortgages held by the Fed under QE1, the first “easing,” the total infusion will be almost $1 trillion.

The following day, Bernanke claimed that the purpose of his move was to create a “wealth effect,” which should feed consumer demand. But Bernanke already knew that QE1 had failed. Indeed, with low interest rates, it had been the primary cause behind this year’s 30 percent decline in the U.S. dollar’s value.

Far from being an incentive to spend, this dollar decline represented a 30 percent tax on all holders of U.S. dollars. So, what else motivated Bernanke to implement a second “easing”• Further, how will it affect American consumers?

Many overlook that most of the currencies in the dollar index basket are themselves falling. Measured against the real money of precious metals, discounted somewhat for buyer speculation, the dollar has fallen by 30 percent this year.

What Bernanke failed to disclose was that his 30 percent devaluation of the dollar had extinguished $4.02 trillion from the value of the U.S. Treasury’s $13.4 trillion debt. In addition, his devaluation reduced the value of the government’s remaining obligations of $189 trillion by a staggering $56.7 trillion.

While hardly a recipe for real growth and cheating all Americans, the devaluation should help consumers reduce their huge real estate debts, thereby aiding the banks.

Bernanke also ignored the monumental social and monetary problems that his debauched generational debt-skipping would cause future generations.

Furthermore, Bernanke, who assisted the recent G-20 finance ministers’ agreement not to engage in competitive devaluations, is now seen as the most competitive of all engineers of devaluation. This has irritated and enraged countries such as Brazil, Russia, India and China. At the full G-20 meeting this weekend, this apparent deceit likely will lead to rancor and further support for China’s calls for the U.S. dollar to be dislodged from its privileged status as the international reserve currency.

If any such G-20 move were successful, it would cause the dollar to plummet. Most real assets including commodities, precious metals and even certain share prices would rise substantially in dollar terms.

Doubtless, debasement of the U.S. dollar will help greatly the exports and profits of major U.S. corporations over the short term. However, history evidences that, over the longer term, a devalued currency creates trade deficits.

If TARP and QE1 are any indication, it is clear that most of the QE2 money will flow to maintain large governmental and financial institutions like Citi that help support securities markets and to large corporations like GM. The result will be that redundant management styles and failed core ethics of old rust companies, banks and government will remain, stifling their replacements and individual Americans of cash.

In short, Bernanke is financing the prevention of the vitally needed restructuring of the American economy.

In addition, much of the QE2 money is likely to flow abroad where it is treated better in growth economies such as Brazil, China, India and Australia, which have raised interest rates.

If QE2 promises such little benefit, many will wonder why Bernanke adopted it. Some opine that his goal is to bring down the current U.S. dollar-based edifice to have it replaced by a new global currency managed by the International Monetary Fund.

However, the U.S. administration likely fears above all else not terrorism but insurrection by an increasingly disgruntled populace. By flooding the nation with synthetic paper currency, it hopes markets will rise in dollar terms and that U.S. consumers will be kept in the dark and quiet.

But the Internet may have changed things decisively. The tea party movement reflects the climate of the nation with people now more aware of the truth and prepared to act. Bernanke must be desperate.

What to do• Wise allocations of savings might follow the money flows to selected real assets like key commodities, precious metals, selected hard currencies, emerging markets and even to certain small companies with game-changing products. Then, individuals might protect their savings from a dollar on death row.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.