ShareThis Page
Bids opened on 2nd phase of downtown revitalization |

Bids opened on 2nd phase of downtown revitalization

| Tuesday, December 31, 2002 12:00 a.m

Washington officials opened bids Monday that will keep the city on — or possibly ahead — of schedule for the second phase of a downtown revitalization.

The city is putting utility lines underground, installing new sewers and fiber optic cable, rebuilding sidewalks and installing new street and traffic lights and trees as part of the $14 million project.

Low bids for the second phase came in at $7.5 million, which was below the $8.4 million estimate, Richard Cleveland of the authority said. Still, he said, unexpected costs may eat into most of the difference after construction on the second, and final, phase begins in April.

“Based on these kinds of projects, we are finding all kinds of stuff from old foundations, trolley tracks and old coal chutes — many things which we will find unexpectedly,” he said.

The $4 million first phase began this year. Now, only paving on Beau and Chestnut streets remains to be done in that phase, and it should be complete in April.

Cleveland said work on Main Street, between Railroad and Walnut streets, could be completed by the end of next year.

Walnut between Main and Highland also could see revitalization work in 2003.

Other segments of the second phase will affect Maiden and Wheeling streets, in 2004, and Cherry Alley, from College to Brownson streets, in 2005.

City council voted 4-1 yesterday to allow EG&G Engineering and PennDOT to select contractors to recommend from the bids opened yesterday. Councilman Bob Nicolella cast the dissenting vote.

Cleveland expects the engineering firm to make its recommendation to the authority in March, and the authority then will submit the recommendations to PennDOT District 12 in Uniontown.

Cleveland hopes contracts can be awarded in March and that work can begin shortly thereafter.

Frank J. Zottola Construction Inc. of Valencia appeared to submit the lowest of seven bids for general construction, at $4.41 million. Zavala Inc. of Pittsburgh had the apparent low bid for electrical work, at $2.89 million.

A $7 million PennDOT transportation enhancement grant will pay for most of the second phase. Money for the $14 million project is coming from 12 sources, including a $1.2 million tax assessed on downtown businesses for capital improvements, and a $4 million bond issue floated by the city. That bond, Cleveland said, is being repaid through federal Community Development Block Grant money.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.