Big 10 roundup: Michigan tops Illinois |

Big 10 roundup: Michigan tops Illinois

The Associated Press

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Never in 131 years have so many points been scored in a Michigan game. And rarely has a victory against Illinois meant so much to the Wolverines.

In the highest scoring game in the storied history of Michigan football, the Wolverines’ defense provided the winning play, stopping a two-point conversion attempt in the third overtime for a 67-65 victory Saturday.

Michael Shaw scored on a 1-yard run and Tate Forcier threw a 2-point conversion to Junior Hemingway to put Michigan up, 67-59. Mikel Leshoure ran for a touchdown to draw the Illini within two. On the conversion try, Michigan blitzed Nathan Scheelhaase, and he could only flip a desperation pass incomplete.

“The defense made a play — a fitting ending,” said Michigan coach Rich Rodriguez, who for the first time in three years as Wolverines coach has a bowl-eligible team.

Michigan’s season will almost assuredly not end against rival Ohio State. For college football’s winningest team, that’s a big deal.

“I feel like a weight has been lifted off of our shoulders,” linebacker Craig Roh said.

Michigan (6-3, 2-3 Big Ten) snapped a three-game losing streak that was making this season feel a lot like the past two, when Rodriguez managed only three conference victories. That the win came a few days after Michigan found out the NCAA would not come down hard on the program for rules violations under Rodriguez made it even sweeter.

“It’s been a good week,” Rodriguez said with a grin.

In a game in which the offenses were all but unstoppable, the Fighting Illini (5-4, 3-3) didn’t go for it on fourth-and-1 from their 42 against one of the nation’s worst defenses. Forcier took advantage, capping an 80-yard drive with a 9-yard, game-tying pass to Darryl Stonum with 1:47 left in regulation.

The 132 points made it the highest-scoring game of the year in major college football and in the history of the Big Ten. The teams combined for 1,237 yards of offense — 676 for Michigan.

• No. 15 Iowa 18, Indiana 13 — Iowa quarterback Ricky Stanzi was frustrated most of the game. Then, one play changed his whole perspective.

The Big Ten’s leader in passing efficiency hooked up with Marvin McNutt for a 52-yard TD pass with 2:50 left, rallying Iowa in Bloomington, Ind.

Iowa (7-2, 4-1) kept pace with the Big Ten’s other one-loss teams and may have saved its hopes for a Rose Bowl bid, but only barely.

Indiana (4-5, 0-5) moved to the Iowa 18 with 45 seconds left, but Hoosiers quarterback Ben Chappell threw three straight incompletions. Then, on fourth-and-10, Damarlo Belcher dropped Chappell’s pass in the end zone. Officials upheld the play on review.

• No. 7 Wisconsin 34, Purdue 13 — In West Lafayette, Ind., Montee Ball ran for a career-high 127 yards and two touchdowns for Wisconsin.

Ball, who got extra work because No. 2 running back James White was out with a knee injury, had scoring runs of 31 and 15 yards for the Badgers (8-1, 4-1). Leading rusher John Clay was held to 42 yards on 12 carries.

Antavian Edison had six catches for 73 yards for the Boilermakers (4-5, 2-3).

• No. 16 Michigan State 31, Minnesota 8 — In East Lansing, Mich., Edwin Baker ran for 179 yards and four touchdowns for Michigan State.

Baker scored twice on fourth down near the goal line to help the Spartans (9-1, 5-1) take a 21-0 halftime lead. Minnesota (1-9, 0-6) never threatened after that en route to its ninth straight loss.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.