ShareThis Page
Big East’s Tranghese retires |

Big East’s Tranghese retires

| Thursday, June 5, 2008 12:00 a.m

Big East Conference commissioner Mike Tranghese, who has been with the league since its inception in 1979 and helped to navigate it through a series of transformations over the years, will retire at the end of the 2008-09 season.

“I am stepping down at this point because I believe it is the right time,” Tranghese said today. “The conference is in great shape and it will give my successor the best opportunity to be successful.

“I believe our conference is undergoing an unprecedented period of success. Our basketball conference does not have to take a back seat to anyone and our football has progressed so quickly. Our Olympic sports are stronger than ever. And I believe everything is in place for the Big East to be even better in the future.”

Pitt and West Virginia are among the league’s 16-team membership. The Big East, which started as a seven-team basketball league, has more than doubled in expansion and offers competition in 23 intercollegiate sports.

Tranghese pushed for the start of the Big East football conference, which later lost three key programs — Boston College, Miami and VirginiaTech — but recovered with the additions of South Florida, Louisville and Cincinnati. The basketball conference also expanded by addingthose three schools as well as Marquette and DePaul.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.