ShareThis Page
Big Ten honors announced |

Big Ten honors announced

The Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:00 a.m

For the first time since it joined the conference in 1993, Penn State does not have a player among the first-team All-Big Ten picks.

The Nittany Lions (3-9, 1-7) earned just two second-team selections — sophomore cornerback Alan Zemaitis and senior safety Yaacov Yisrael.

Also, senior linebacker Gino Capone and senior corner Richard Gardner were given honorable-mention status.

Zemaitis was chosen to the second team by a panel of media who cover the league. A first-year starter, Zemaitis led the Big Ten and ranked sixth nationally with 22 passes defended, including 18 break-ups. He topped the team with four interceptions.

Yisrael was picked by a poll of the conference’s coaches. He started every game this season after missing all of 2002 with a knee injury. He was second on the team with 93 tackles (57 solo), and made three interceptions.

Penn State had at least two first-team All-Big Ten players in every year except 2001, when Jimmy Kennedy was its only top choice. It put seven players on the first team in 1994 and six in ’99.

Tailback Chris Perry of Michigan was named the league’s offensive player of the year by the coaches and media. Defensive end Will Smith of Ohio State is the consensus defensive player of the year.

The coaches chose Michigan’s Steve Breaston (Woodland Hills) and Minnesota’s Laurence Maroney as co-freshmen of the year. The media opted to give the award to Maroney.

The media named John L. Smith of Michigan State as coach of the year.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.