ShareThis Page
Bill calls for school workers’ rap sheets |

Bill calls for school workers’ rap sheets

| Monday, July 10, 2006 12:00 a.m

Anyone who wants to work for a Pennsylvania school system will have to add FBI “rap sheets” to their resumes under a bill that Gov. Ed Rendell plans to sign into law this week.

Kate Philips, Rendell’s spokeswoman, said current law requires an FBI criminal background check only of education job applicants who also are new state residents. Anyone who has lived in the state for at least two years only has to get a state police background check, which covers only crimes committed in Pennsylvania.

“Over the past couple of years, a couple of people have slipped through the cracks,” she said.

The provision would take effect April 1 and apply to all prospective employees of public and private schools, intermediate units and vocational-technical schools. The law would cover teachers, substitutes, janitors, cafeteria workers, bus drivers, independent contractors and their employees, except those who have no direct contact with children.

The requirement also would apply to student teachers, who are not employees but work in classrooms as they move toward receiving teaching certification.

Rep. Lawrence H. Curry, D-Montgomery, proposed federal background checks in 2005 after he learned that a Cheltenham Township School District substitute teacher had been convicted of assault in Virginia.

Philips said the legislation puts the burden of getting the rap sheet on the applicant.

“There would actually be no cost to the commonwealth because the applicants would pay it,” she said.

FBI spokesman Jeff Killeen said the cost to the job applicant is $18, the fee the agency’s Criminal Justices Information Services Division charges for pulling together someone’s criminal background record.

“Anybody can ask for a copy of their own rap sheet,” he said.

Philips said the $18 is in addition to the $10 the state police charge for doing a Pennsylvania criminal background check.

Representatives of two teacher unions said their organizations have no objections to the requirement.

“It wasn’t necessarily a priority of ours, but we don’t have any problem with it,” said Beth Schwartz, of the Pennsylvania State Education Association.

John Tarka, president of the Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers, said the hiring system has several safeguards, but it doesn’t hurt to add this one.

“We do not object to it,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.