ShareThis Page
Bin Laden alive and healthy despite shrapnel wound, newspaper editor says |

Bin Laden alive and healthy despite shrapnel wound, newspaper editor says

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:00 a.m

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) — Osama bin Laden was wounded in a U.S. bombing raid on Afghanistan in December but is in good health, the editor of a London-based Arabic newspaper said Monday.

Abd al-Bari Atwan, the editor of the London-based Al-Quds Al-Arabi, said sources close to the al-Qaida leader “confirmed to me that the man is in good health.”

There was no way to verify Atwan’s information.

U.S. officials say they have no evidence bin Laden was wounded but say it is a possibility.

While the Bush administration has said publicly it does not know whether bin Laden is alive or dead, U.S. counterterrorism officials privately say they believe he is alive.

In Washington, Pentagon spokeswoman Victoria Clark said she was aware of the report “but we don’t have anything to add to it.”

On Saturday, the head of Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service, was quoted in the Welt am Sonntag newspaper as saying bin Laden is alive and hiding along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

Atwan gave several interviews yesterday to promote the newspaper’s story, which is to appear in today’s editions.

Bin Laden was wounded during a U.S. bombing raid in December in Tora Bora, where al-Qaida members were thought to be hiding out, Atwan said.

“It happened during the American carpet-bombing of Tora Bora in Afghanistan,” Atwan said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. He said bin Laden underwent surgery to remove shrapnel from his left shoulder.

Bin Laden has been videotaped at least twice since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the United States.

Atwan said he had been told that al-Qaida supporters were planning new attacks and that bin Laden was planning to capitalize on a possible U.S. strike on Iraq.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.