ShareThis Page
Bishop Guilfoyle stuns Greensburg Central Catholic |

Bishop Guilfoyle stuns Greensburg Central Catholic

Coach Ed Pultz never thought Greensburg Central Catholic was in danger of losing its PIAA playoff opener Friday night — until he glanced at the game clock with 14 seconds to go.

“I saw we were down by eight points, and I thought to myself, What are we gonna do now?” Pultz said.

Greensburg Central didn’t have a miracle rally in its game plan. Bishop Guilfoyle pulled off a stunning 39-30 upset in the first round of the PIAA Class AA girls basketball playoffs at Highlands High School.

“It’s a rough end, losing the first playoff game for states,” GCC forward Lea Stern said. “We thought we were going to go the whole way through. It’s a tough end.”

GCC (22-6) went into the game riding a 12-game winning streak, which included a victory in the WPIAL title game. It was ranked No. 1 in the state and was a heavy favorite to capture the PIAA crown.

Even though Bishop Guilfoyle (22-8) was just the third-seeded team out of District 6, Pultz knew the Marauders were dangerous.

“I knew we were going to be in for a dogfight,” he said. “I knew that no matter what, they weren’t going to give up. For what I saw on film, I thought they were one of the best teams in the western side of the (PIAA) bracket.”

Guilfoyle outscored GCC 14-7 in the fourth quarter — even though it failed to make a bucket in the final 5:21 of the game. The Marauders made 10-of-13 foul shots in the final period, including an 8-for-8 effort by junior guard Angela Greaser.

Greaser, who only practiced once in the week before the game because of a knee injury, finished with a game-high 14 points. She scored her only field goal with 2:57 left in the first period — a strong dribble-drive layup — then canned all 12 of her free throws.

For the game, Guilfoyle made 17-of-21 foul shots. Greensburg Central went to the line eight times and got five points.

“That’s a huge disparity in an eight-point game,” Pultz said. “We were hoping to get to the foul line a little bit more. But, at times, we got a little bit out of sync out there.”

That was most evident in the second quarter, when GCC squandered a 15-5 lead. The Centurions were outscored 10-4 in the period and led by just two points at halftime.

During the break, Pultz begged his team to press its significant height advantage and do a better job of rebounding.

GCC began coming up with loose balls in the third but missed its first four shots and turned the ball over twice before finally scoring. By then, Guilfoyle was up 21-19.

“We were putting so much effort into attacking the boards, but we weren’t finishing,” he said. “That’s frustrating.”

As time wound down in the third, Guilfoyle landed a killer blow. Katie Gartmann escaped GCC’s pressing defense and launched a twisting, running jumper that slipped through the net at the buzzer. Guilfoyle led for good, 25-23.

“It was a big shot for them,” Pultz said. “It juiced them up.”

Stern made a pair of difficult, off-balance layups to pull GCC within 32-29 with two minutes to go in the game. But the Centurions missed their final four shots of the game, then looked on helplessly as Greaser made eight foul shots to ice it.

“We didn’t know what to do because we’re not used to that situation,” Stern said. “We’re a win team. We go for the win right away.”

“It’s very shocking. No matter what plays we tried, we couldn’t pull through.”

  • Notes: Arlene Mull led GCC with 12 points. … Guilfoyle got all but two of its points from its five starters. … GCC started four seniors and one junior; Guilfoyle started four juniors and one senior.

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.