Archive

ShareThis Page
Blairsville rolls into District 6 semifinals | TribLIVE.com
News

Blairsville rolls into District 6 semifinals

Tribune-Review
| Sunday, November 6, 2005 12:00 a.m

THREE SPRINGS — Nick Stone and his Blairsville teammates remembered all too fondly how they squandered a 14-point third-quarter lead on a November night in last year’s District 6 Class A playoffs.

This time, Blairsville made sure it didn’t happen again.

Stone scored four touchdowns — two rushing and two receiving — and had 288 all-purpose yards as Blairsville defeated Southern Huntingdon, 35-19, on Saturday night.

“(With) Nick Stone and Zack Sabella you have two possible game breakers,” Blairsville coach Ab Dettorre said. “We have guys … that can all make plays.”

Blairsville will play No. 1 seed Bishop Carroll (10-0), a team which has beaten Blairsville in the District 6 semifinals three out of the past four years. That game will likely be Friday night at Penn Cambria High School.

“It’s a whole different game plan next week,” Dettorre said. “It’s a whole different style.”

Blairsville (8-1) torched Southern Huntingdon, the fourth-best defense in the district, for 451 yards of total offense.

“It’s the postseason now,” Dettorre said. “We won our conference, and we want that to continue (the momentum) and to get to that district final. We think we’re a capable team, and we think we belong there. But we still have to prove ourselves.”

Blairsville quarterback Adam Highberger, who was 13 of 18 for 233 yards and three touchdowns, struggled early, but his 3-yard pass to Sabella to put Blairsville up for good, 14-7, with 30 seconds left in the first half. The score was set up when defensive lineman Tom Gaston recovered a Johnny Neuder fumble at the Southern Huntingdon 43.

“They’re kids,” Dettorre said of his quarterback. “They get into a big game situation, and they know this is it – all or nothing.”

Highberger settled down, and so did his teammates after halftime, as Blairsville scored on its first three possessions of the second half. Blairsville’s defense also played inspired. After allowing 108 first-quarter yards, the Bobcats allowed only 80 in the second and third quarters.

“Our guys knew this would be a tough game, coming over 100 miles,” Dettorre said. “I’m just very proud of my kids. I thought the coaches coached very well, and I’m estatic the way we played defense.”

Southern Huntingdon took a 7-0 lead with 1:45 left in the first quarter after driving 77 yards in six plays, including to key runs of 44 and 17 by Neuder. The 17-yard gain set up a first-and-goal at the Blairsville 6. Two plays later, fullback Troy Hoover scored from 2 yards out.

Blairsville tied the score at seven with 6:32 left in the second quarter. Stone and Sabella keyed the 5-play, 64-yard drive, with Stone capping the drive with a 17-yard run.

Nueder rushed for 138 yards on 19 carries and two touchdowns. It was his eighth 100-yard game this season. But Blairville shut him down after he gained 80 yards in the first quarter alone.

“They did a good job keeping our running game in check,” Southern Huntingdon coach Ryan Garlock said. “I thought we did some good things against their defense, but they’re tough as hell, and we couldn’t get our run game going.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.