ShareThis Page
BNY Mellon shareholders vote to limit executive severance packages |

BNY Mellon shareholders vote to limit executive severance packages

| Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:00 a.m

Shareholders of Bank of New York Mellon Corp. adopted a proposal to rein in “golden parachutes” for executives Tuesday at the bank’s annual meeting.

The resolution advises — but does not require — the board of directors to limit severance payments to less than three times an executive’s salary plus bonus, unless approved by shareholders.

Experts say resolutions proposed by shareholders at annual meetings rarely get adopted if they don’t have the support of management and the board. But shareholders, especially those owning stock in big banks, have been irked by executive bonuses that were paid during the financial crisis.

BNY Mellon’s board had urged shareholders gathered at the meeting Downtown to vote against the proposal, as company boards usually do regarding proposals not their own.

“Shareholders’ proposals don’t get passed that often,” said Gary Hewitt, spokesman for RiskMetrics Group, New York firm that analyzes proxy statements.

Even relatively popular proposals from shareholders fall short. Proposals related to golden parachutes were approved in 34 percent of the annual meetings where they were brought up, Hewitt said. Even with the public’s anger over Wall Street bonuses last year, “say on pay” proposals garnered shareholder approval an average of 46 percent of the time.

The BNY Mellon resolution applies to future severance agreements, not ones already in place, said a shareholder representing Trowel Trades S&P Index fund, which submitted the proposal. The fund owns 34,711 shares of BNY Mellon.

In a statement supporting its proposal, Trowel Trades called severance agreements “excessive in light of the high levels of compensation” in corporate America.

BNY Mellon’s board is reviewing its severance agreement policies, CEO Robert Kelly said at the meeting, held at the Omni William Penn Hotel.

Kelly received $14 million in total pay last year, about the same as in 2008, according to proxy materials. His salary of $1 million was about $6,000 higher than in 2008, and he did not receive a cash bonus in either year.

Kelly is entitled to as much as $81 million in severance payments — including $33 million in cash — under an agreement that expires in July.

Another matter of great shareholder interest, a dividend increase, is on hold, Kelly said. Regulators are being conservative about allowing banks to pay out more, and Kelly wants to log several quarters of healthy profits before raising the quarterly dividend. It was cut to 9 cents a share from 24 cents last April.

Two other BNY Mellon shareholder proposals failed to pass. One sought to prohibit executives from selling off stock awards in the first five years, in order to encouragement managing for the long term. Another proposal, for cumulative voting, would have let shareholders aggregate their votes behind one director candidate.

Additional Information:

Signs of change

The Mellons are coming off the top of BNY Mellon Center on Saturday, along with the encircled M logo.

Before year-end, the signs of former Mellon Financial Corp. on the Downtown building will be replaced with the name of the merged bank, ‘BNY Mellon,’ along with its gold, silver and bronze logo.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.