ShareThis Page
Boehner urges Clinton to push trade measures |

Boehner urges Clinton to push trade measures

Patrick Cloonan
| Sunday, May 3, 2015 9:09 p.m
FILE - In this April 14, 2015 file photo, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. Boehner said Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to back trade legislation that President Barack Obama wants — and help get Democrats on board. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

WASHINGTON — Republican House Speaker John Boehner challenged Hillary Clinton on Sunday to help the White House get trade legislation through Congress by speaking out in favor of it.

Lawmakers are debating whether to give President Obama “fast-track” authority to negotiate deals such as the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Trade is a rare issue on which the White House enjoys support from Republicans, but many Democrats are opposed.

“She can’t sit on the sidelines and let the president swing in the wind here,” Boehner said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Boehner said Clinton, 2016 presidential contender and former secretary of State, supports fast-track authority and the TPP, but “she just won’t say so.”

The White House says free-trade deals open up markets to U.S. exports and help businesses compete abroad. But many Democrats and their supporters, including labor unions, say the deals help big corporations at the expense of American jobs.

Clinton has not stated a clear position on fast-track legislation or on the negotiation of the TPP deal with Asia. She recently said that any trade deal “has to produce jobs and raise wages and increase prosperity and protect our security.”

Rep. James Clyburn, a member of House Democratic leadership, said this week he didn’t know whether there were even 20 votes out of a total of 188 Democrats in the House for fast-track authority, known as Trade Promotion Authority (TPA).

“The fact is that the president needs her help in order to get Democrat votes in the House and Senate to get this passed,” Boehner said Sunday.

There are 244 Republicans in the House, but not all of them support trade deals; Boehner’s allies estimate that he may be able to get only 180 to 200 Republican votes for TPA.

Boehner told NBC that every Democratic leader in Congress is opposed to the president’s position.

“We’ve got the majority here in the House and the Senate, but we can’t do this by ourselves,” Boehner said of Republicans.

Clinton has been criticized by Republican Jeb Bush, a potential presidential candidate, for her reticence on trade.

Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions expressed concerns Sunday about TPA, including the strengthening of presidential power over trade at the expense of Congress and the risk of currency manipulation and increased trade deficits and immigration.

“Perhaps we don’t need a fast-track, but a regular track: where the president sends us any proposal he deems worthy and we review it on its own merits,” the Alabama lawmaker said in a statement.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.