Bombers to train over Plains |

Bombers to train over Plains

The Associated Press

BILLINGS, Mont. — Any given location across a sprawling area of the Northern Plains could see up to nine low-altitude overflights by military aircraft annually under a proposed expansion of an Air Force bomber training area detailed Friday.

Supersonic flights in the area would be limited to 10 days a year during large-scale exercises involving roughly 20 aircraft. Civilian flights would face sharp restrictions during those times.

Details of the Air Force plan emerged with the release of a long-awaited, 502-page environmental study of a proposal in the works since 2006.

The Powder River training area now spans about 8,300 square miles and can accommodate only one or two bombers at a time.

A much larger area that could be occupied by 20 bombers, fighters and tankers at once would create a more realistic environment where crews “would more readily train as they will fight,” the Air Force study concluded.

The Air Force wants to triple the size of its Powder River Training Complex to roughly 28,000 square miles. Thatwould include airspace over Montana, Wyoming and the Dakotas.

It would be used by B-1 and B-52 bombers and could save the military $23 million a year by reducing the number of sorties now being sent to Utah and Nevada for exercises, officials said.

Friday’s study release kicked off a 30-day waiting period until a final decision is made by the Air Force. Federal Aviation Administration approval also is needed.

Elected officials from South Dakota have been supportive of the proposal. Republican U.S. Sen. John Thune has described the expansion as vital to keeping open Ellsworth Air Force Base near Rapid City.

It has faced strong resistance from Montana elected leaders and state aviation officials. They say more bombers — conducting maneuvers and dropping flares and chaff as they roar overhead — would disrupt rural communities and scare livestock.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.