ShareThis Page
‘Bonusgate’ probe uncovers sleaze |

‘Bonusgate’ probe uncovers sleaze

| Tuesday, July 15, 2008 12:00 a.m

We try to remember that they are all innocent until proven guilty. That was the only comfort as we watched 12 public servants being marched around in handcuffs last Friday like common criminals.

Former House Minority Whip Mike Veon, current state Rep. Sean Ramaley and 10 legislative aides are the first people formally charged in a year-long investigation into “Bonusgate.” The 12 Democrats have brought a new level of embarrassment to Pennsylvania’s state government, a body that was already suffering from low public confidence.

Their alleged crime was a scheme to use legislative aides — who were being paid by the taxpayers — as workers on Democratic political campaigns while they were on state time. The staffers received generous bonuses from the state treasury for the hours they spent on the campaign trail.

The alleged mastermind of this endeavor was Veon, who is charged with 59 counts of conflict of interest, theft and conspiracy.

State Attorney General Tom Corbett, who ran the investigation, alleges that Veon “ran an illegal campaign organization from his offices.” That operation reportedly included fundraising, opposition research, campaign mailings, e-mails and nomination petition challenges — all paid for by state taxpayers.

In addition, the grand jury charges that Veon set up extravagant public-funded dinners for himself and fellow Democratic officials, totalling $22,000 over four years. He is also accused of giving two employees nearly $1,500 in state funds to take two family motorcycles to a 2004 rally in Sturgis, S.D., so they would be waiting when Veon and his wife flew in.

Unfortunately, the charges that came down last week are likely to be just the tip of a stinking pile of garbage in Harrisburg. When Corbett announced the grand jury’s findings, he promised to continue investigating lawmakers from both parties, and we shudder to think about what he still may uncover.

But for now, Veon and his cronies are the new face of corruption in state government. They callously violated the public trust that is invested in their positions, and treated the money of hard-working Pennsylvanians like it came from a board game.

We are encouraged by Corbett’s progress so far, and we urge him to keep going until the last tawdry piece of corruption is uncovered.

The first step to giving the state a government it can be proud of is getting rid of the people who are causing the embarrassment.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.