Boots in the face |

Boots in the face

What’s the perfect way for a government to indict itself, to show that people are being governed by a tyrannical regime that’s establishing the nightmarish society depicted in George Orwell’s “1984” — a nation where individualism and free thought is crushed and the ruling party is all-pervading?

Answer: Have the police arrest anyone who is reading Orwell’s “1984.”

“The crackdown on opposition to the May 22 coup continues,” Time magazine reported this past summer regarding the Thai government’s suppression of pro-democracy, anti-martial law demonstrators in Bangkok. “On Sunday, June 22, eight people were arrested outside the capital’s Siam Paragon mall — one for reading George Orwell’s dystopian classic ‘1984,’ copies of which have become symbols of the protest movement.”

Reported The Associated Press on June 22: “The junta that took power last month has proven to be one of the most repressive regimes in Thailand in more than four decades. Military authorities have made it clear they will tolerate no dissent. They have summoned hundreds of people perceived as threats to public order — mostly members of the ousted government, activists and intellectuals; most of those released have had to sign pledges saying they will not instigate unrest.”

Continued the AP, referring to Orwell’s “1984,” “Handfuls of anti-coup protesters have staged several silent readings of the classic book elsewhere in the capital in recent weeks because they say its indictment of totalitarianism has become relevant after the army deposed the nation’s elected government.”

A Thai journalist who witnessed the arrest of the man reading Orwell’s book reported the man “was taken away by half a dozen plainclothes police,” according to the AP. The man at first “read the book quietly, then held it up as officers approached and journalists took photos. When questioned, the man said he was reading the book for ‘liberty, equality and fraternity’ — the slogan of the French revolution.”

With a large decline in tourism in Thailand since the coup, the military junta began promoting “martial law tourism.” The government’s ad campaign,“24 Hours Enjoy Thailand,” stresses that the new, far-reaching arrest and confinement powers ensure that foreign tourists “can be safe 24 hours a day.”

In Orwell’s “1984,” a man named O’Brien, a prominent and zealous leader of the Inner Party, appears at the cell of Winston Smith to torture and brainwash him into becoming a loyal subject of Big Brother.

O’Brien paints a dispiriting picture for Smith of the world that is being created: “There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. … If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever. And remember, that is forever. The face will always be there to be stamped upon. The heretic, the enemy of society, will always be there, so that he can be defeated and humiliated over again.”

Ralph R. Reiland is an associate professor of economics at Robert Morris University and a local restaurateur ([email protected]).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.